Writing about web page http://www.hive-brain.com/archives/000043.php#more
There are two main types of applications where I think Flash is a big lose compared to HTML:
1. Anything with a fair amount of textual content
2. Anything with heavy use of forms/ standard UI controls. My initial post mentioned a couple of missing HTML tags whose absence cause me problems, but those individual examples are not the point. The bigger point is, Flash (as a vector animation tool) is never going to be nearly as good at presenting text as a real browser.
I’ve come up with clever (and bandwidth-heavy) solutions for things like sub- and superscripts. I’ve embedded symbol fonts so I can present the quivalent of HTML entities. But isn’t it a waste of my development time to be solving problems like the presentation of subscripts, when there already exists an environment that can handle that easily? And if I’m presenting lots of textual content to a client, wouldn’t it be better if the experience they had with that content was like their experience on every other site they visit (Things like “select all”, scrolling, resizing, etc.)
Another big issue with presenting text in Flash (and one I’m grappling with right now) ha to do with accessibility and exposure to crawlers. Sure there are things you can do, and I’m sure Macromedia has some spiffy ideas on their site somewhere, but again, isn’t that a big waste of a developer’s time?
I’m with you, Charlie

The first in my series of ‘inspirational and aspirational’ uses of Flash, or as I prefer to think of it, ‘Flash stuff that I think